Date: 15th-July, 2012
Introduction
Dear Friends, I would like to
register on behalf of Renk Diocese and all the community of the ECS acknowledgment and appreciation for
the high support of the Diocese of Chicago and our friends at Tyndale House
Foundation. Knowing that ECS-Renk Diocese has a unit for development helps
returnees through WFP (World Food Program).
ECS-Renk Development and Relief
Agency (ECS-REDRA) is a non-governmental international, non-profit,
non-political organization, officially registered with the government of the
Republic of South Sudan, since 2010.
> Cooperating with WFP in providing services for the implementation of
General Food Distribution (GFD),
Blanket Supplementary Feeding Programme (BSFP),
Targeted Supplementary Feeding Programme (TSFP),
Institutional Feeding Programme (IFP),
and Food For Education (FFE) for a
total of 16,186, beneficiaries and
a total of 683.18.Mt(?) of food as
described in approved proposal submitted by the ECS-REDRA partner to WFP for
the period from April-December, 2012.
> Cooperating with the Fellowship of the African Relief (FAR) in the
Livelihood and Food Security Project that was designed to targeting the small
Farmers and vulnerable groups in Melut County.
> Also previously had a strong partnership with Christian Aid Organization
in the area of Education and Development and Risk Reduction areas of which a
considerable number of projects have been implemented within the period of
(2009 -2010)
Returnees
Statistics in Renk County
In addition to the already existing
(17,700) returnees stranded in
Renk County, which are located temporally in 3 resettlement camps around Renk
town, such as, Abayok, Mina, and Payueer, there is a new influx of returnees
from Khartoum and Kosti that had started their arrivals in Renk from early of
March, 2012 until the date of this report. (July 15)
However, it is worth mentioning
that after all routes leading to South Sudan from north Sudan have been closed
down due to the arms disputes along the border, the fact is that made the road
between Renk and Kosti the only path where all the returnees and their
repatriations operations were executed by the IOM and other working partners
going through Renk as a transit way station.
The number is estimated to be around (4,000)
returnees divided into the above three resettlement camps. The following table
shows the camps and their populations:
Camps in Renk
Location/Camp
|
Number
of People
|
Remarks
|
Abayok
|
12,905
|
Mixed
population but main destination UNS, NBeG & Jonglei
|
Mina
|
8,637
|
Located
at the river front. Mixed population but main destination Unity, Warrap, CES,
UNS
|
Agany
|
873
|
Population
mainly for greater Upper Nile/Malakal
|
Payuer
|
1,7304
|
Population
mainly destined to greater NBG.
|
Total
|
24,419
|
This
includes some 2,300 due to leave
shortly by barge & boat
|
With the subtraction of those who
have been transported by the IOM to their final destinations in South Sudan
States, the current remaining returnees’ number in Renk is estimated to be (22,119), divided into the above mentioned
camps as well.
Food Distributed since
April, 2012.
Below table shows the distributed
food to beneficiaries from April-June, 2012
|
|
|
|
||||
From April-June,2012
|
Commodities
|
Units
|
Mts
|
Ben.
|
Location
|
Remarks
|
|
|
Wheat
|
13,548
|
270.975
|
31,119
|
All Camps & Residents
|
|
|
|
Sorghum
|
5,707
|
114.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lentils
|
2,697
|
53.965
|
|
|
|
|
|
V,Oil
|
17,786
|
392.100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
39,738
|
831.190
|
31,119
|
Mina
|
|
Barge Transporting
People and their luggage’s to Juba
Problems &
Challenges.
As mentioned above, the influx of
the returnees into Renk County as a transit way station started since April,
2010, and the number of returnees that were transported by IOM to their final
destinations in South Sudan was a small number in comparison to the number
still stranded in Renk County up to now.
And the following problems and challenges have
been identified as the main constraints to the transportation of these
returnees. Their feeding mechanism is a grave concern.
1.
Lack of
transportation facilities in South Sudan
2.
Lack of
fuel for the available barges and trucks.
3.
Effects of
the rainy season on the process of transportation on land.
4.
Inconsistency
of the figures provided by IOM and SRRC.
5.
There is no
clear plan for the final completion of transportation of returnees.
6.
The host
community is suffering because of many returnees, and they are not getting
anything from WFP. We distributed to them some food and medicine, but it is not
enough.
Therefore, there is more need of
support for the host communities. not just in Renk but also in Melut and Maban
Many Blessings and thank you,
+ Joseph
Bishop Joseph Garang Atem, Diocese
of Renk
No comments:
Post a Comment